The applicant failed to appear and seek accommodation in the second call. The special jurisdiction in contempt hereby dismisses the contempt proceedings (CC/5/2013) for default and vacates any interim order, if any.
Contempt proceedings (CC/5/2013) dismissed for default; interim order, if any, vacated.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
OD 27
CC/5/2013
IN THE HIGH COURT AT CALCUTTA Special Jurisdiction (Contempt) ORIGINAL SIDE
RAMESHWAR LAL AGARWAL VS GYANCHAND AGARWAL AND ORS.
BEFORE:
The Hon'ble JUSTICE RAJARSHI BHARADWAJ Date: 2nd May, 2023.
The Court: None appears on behalf of the parties even in the second call. No accommodation is sought for by the applicant.
Accordingly, CC/5/2013 is dismissed for default.
Interim order, if any, shall stand vacated.
(RAJARSHI BHARADWAJ, J.)
B.Pal
Rameshwar Lal Agarwal
Gyanchand Agarwal and Ors.
Rajarshi Bhardwaj
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
