The High Court dismissed the writ petition (BIFR/69/1995) and all connected applications for default due to the non-appearance of the parties at the second call.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
O-84
IN THE HIGH COURT AT CALCUTTA Original Jurisdiction ORIGINAL SIDE
BIFR/69/1995 IA NO: CA/2/2002(Old No:CA/524/2002), CA/3/2006(Old No:CA/638/2006), CA/5/2008(Old No:CA/230/2008), CA/13/2023
IN THE MATTER OF A.S.ROTOTECH LTD.(IN LIQN.)
BEFORE:
The Hon'ble JUSTICE RAVI KRISHAN KAPUR Date : 7th June, 2023
The Court:- None appears on behalf of the parties nor is any accommodation prayed for on their behalf even in the second call.
In view of the repeated non-appearance of the parties, BIFR/69/1995 stands dismissed for default.
All connected applications being CA/2/2002(Old No:CA/524/2002), CA /3/2006 (Old No: CA /638/2006), CA/5/2008 (Old No:CA/230/2008), CA /13 / 2023 also stand dismissed for default.
Interim orders, if any, stand vacated.
(RAVI KRISHAN KAPUR, J.)
D.Ghosh
A.S. ROTOTECH LTD.
Ravi Krishan Kapur
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court