The High Court at Calcutta allowed the petitioner to withdraw the writ petition (W.P. No. 2182 of 2022), dismissing the same as withdrawn while reserving liberty to file appropriate proceedings on the subject matter.
Leave granted to withdraw; W.P. dismissed as withdrawn.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
OD 4
WPO 2182 of 2022
IN THE HIGH COURT AT CALCUTTA CONSTITUTIONAL WRIT JURISDICTION ORIGINAL SIDE
AMITAVA DE BHOWMICK VERSUS
THE STATE OF WEST BENGAL AND ORS.
BEFORE:
The Hon'ble JUSTICE RAJASEKHAR MANTHA Date : 19th May, 2022.
APPEARANCE: Mr. Sanjib Chakraborty,Adv. …for the petitioner.
Mr. Saunak Bhattacharya,Adv. Mr. Ganesh Manna,Adv. Mr. Saunak Mandal,Adv. …for respondent nos. 15 to 18
Mr. Suddhasatva Banerjee,Adv. Mr. S. Nayak,Adv. Mr. Sumit Biswas,Adv. …for private respondents.
Mr. Amitesh Banerjee,Sr. Adv. Ms. Ipsita Banerjee,Adv. …for State.
The Court:- On prayer made by Mr. Sanjib Chakraborty, Ld. Counsel appearing for the petitioner, leave is granted to the petitioner to withdraw the writ petition. WPO No. 2182 of 2022 stands dismissed as withdrawn.
2
Liberty is, however, reserved to the writ petitioner to take out appropriate
proceedings in accordance with law on the subject matter of the writ petition.
(RAJASEKHAR MANTHA, J.)
S.Chandra
Amitava De Bhowmick
The State of West Bengal
Rajasekhar Mantha
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
