The Calcutta High Court, Special Civil Jurisdiction (Contempt) Appellate Side, was informed of affidavits filed by respondents. The matter was adjourned to allow the petitioner to consider these reports and issue instructions.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
17.01.2025 Court No.23 DL/Item No.–2 [Milan, A.R. (Ct.)]
IN THE HIGH COURT AT CALCUTTA Special Civil Jurisdiction (Contempt) Appellate Side
CPAN 1654 of 2023 In WPA 8892 of 2016 Smt. Sanjukta Bhattacharya versus Krishnendu Chakraborty & Ors.
Mr. Udayan Chakravarty,
Ms. Nilanjana Dasgupta
….for the petitioner/applicant Mr. Somnath Ganguli, Mr. Bikash Goswami, Ms. Priyamvada Singh
….for the alleged contemnor nos.1 & 2 Mr. Suman Basu Mrs. Debapriya Ghosh
….for the added contemnor/alleged contemnor no.3
The report in the form of an affidavit by the alleged contemnor/respondent nos.1 & 2 and the report also in the form of an affidavit on behalf of the added contemnor no.3 filed in Court today are taken on record.
Copy of the two reports have been made over to the learned advocate for the petitioner in course of hearing of the matter.
Let this matter be adjourned to enable the learned advocate for the petitioner to consider the reports and take necessary instructions.
Let this matter appear on 31st January, 2025.
(Arindam Mukherjee, J.)
Smt. Sanjukta Bhattacharya
Krishnendu Chakraborty
Suman Basu
Mrs. Debapriya Ghosh
Arindam Mukherjee
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
