Allowed

Susanta Kumar Roy v. State of West Bengal and Ors.

Calcutta HC19 May 2022WPA/8867/2022

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The High Court allowed a writ petition seeking interest on delayed gratuity and arrear pension. The petitioner, a retired library peon, claimed delayed payment by authorities. The court directed the Director of Public Instruction and treasury to pay 8% interest from August 1, 2020.

What did the court decide?

Directed the Director of Public Instruction and concerned treasury officer to pay interest @ 8% per annum on gratuity and arrear pension from 1st August 2020.

Susanta Kumar Roy Vs State of West Bengal… — Pension and Retirement Benefits | Calcutta HC (2022)

¶1

19.05.2022 Ct. 5 D/L 15 ab

¶2

WPA 8867 of 2022

¶3

Susanta Kumar Roy -Vs- The State of West Bengal & Ors.

¶4

Mr. Sudip Sarkar

¶5

... for the petitioner

¶6

Ms. Tuli Sinha,

¶7

… for the State

¶8

Affidavit of service filed in Court today is kept on record.

¶9

The petitioner was a library peon of a College, who retired from service on 31^st July, 2020. He had completed all pension-related formalities. The pension payment order was issued on 17^th November, 2021.

¶10

However, the concerned authorities delayed and released the gratuity and arrear pension amount on 18^th January, 2022. The petitioner herein seeks interest to be paid on the gratuity amount for the interim period of delay in receipt of the gratuity.

¶11

There is a considerable delay in filing of the writ petition, which the petitioner seeks to justify by stating that there is no statutory period of limitation and neither parties have suffered due to this delay. It is the

¶12

¶13

submission of the petitioner that accordingly the petition should be allowed.

¶14

The petitioner relies upon an order in W.P. 17557(W) of 2017 (Narayan Chandra Saha Vs. State of West Bengal & Ors.) wherein a co-ordinate Bench had relied upon the Supreme Court Judgement in the case of Union of India Vs. Tarsem Singh , reported in (2008) 8 SCC 648 on the issue of limitation relating to payment or refixation of pay or pension wherein the apex Court had held that relief may be granted in spite of delay as it does not affect the right of the third party.

¶15

In view of the above and after hearing the learned counsel for the parties, I direct the Director of Public Instruction, Government of West Bengal as also the concerned treasury officer to pay interest to the petitioner @ 8% per annum on the gratuity and arrear pension amount calculated from 1^st August, 2020 till the date of payment. Such payment is to be made within a period of eight weeks from the date of communication of this order.

¶16

This writ petition is accordingly disposed of without however, any order as to costs.

¶17

Certified website copy of this order, if applied for, shall be given to the parties.

¶18

( Moushumi Bhattacharya, J.)

¶19

Susanta Kumar Roy v. State of West Bengal and Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Susanta Kumar Roy v. State of West Bengal and Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Cases cited

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Papy Pattanayak and Ors. Vs Dr. Ajay Chakraborty and Anr.

Ashoke Kumar Pramanick Vs State of West Bengal and Ors.

Asijit Roy and Anr. Vs the University of Calcutta and Ors.

Mintu Kumar Bose Vs State of West Bengal and Ors.

Dipika Sarkar Vs the University of Gour Banga and Ors.

Kaniska Roy and Anr. Vs State of West Bengal and Ors.