Arup Dey v. State of West Bengal and Ors.
Case brief
What is this about?
Sl. No. 02 Ct. No. 36 CPAN 682 of 2022 in…
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
11.08.2023 sayandeep Sl. No. 02 Ct. No. 36
CPAN 682 of 2022 in WPA 8290 of 2022
Arup Dey
-Versus-
Sunil Agarwal & Anr.
Mr. Soumen Kr. Dutta Mr. Sabyasachi Bhattacharjee
….. for the petitioner
Mr. T.M. Siddiqui Mr. Suddhadev Adak
……for the State
Learned counsel appearing for the alleged contemnor makes a prayer for the matter to be adjourned for two months on the basis of an order passed by the Division Bench in a challenge made to the order passed by this Court. Counsel submits that the alleged contemnor has been given two months to make payment to the petitioner.
List this matter on 6th October, 2023 as prayed
for.
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
Arup Dey
- respondent
Sunil Agarwal
Coram
Moushumi Bhattacharya
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
- Court
- Calcutta HC
- Decided on
- · June
- Registered
- Case no.
- WPA/8290/2022
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court