Disposed

Pawan Arora v. State of West Bengal and Ors.

Calcutta HC11 Jul 2022WPA/8266/2022

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The petitioner, holding an expired long-term mining lease, sought extension due to the pandemic under a force majeure clause. The High Court directed the authority to consider the representation within one month after affording a hearing to interested parties.

What did the court decide?

Direction to the 3rd respondent to consider and dispose of the petitioner's representation within one month after affording a hearing.

Pawan Arora Vs State of West Bengal and Ors. — Property and Title | Calcutta HC (2022)

¶1

11.07.2022 jb. 25

¶2

WPA No. 8266 of 2022 Pawan Arora Versus

¶3

The State of West Bengal & Ors.

Mr. Mir Anowar

…for the petitioner

Mr. Chandi Charan De

Mr. Anirban Sarkar

…for the State

Mr. Sanjay Saha Mr. S. Bhattacharya …for the WBMDTC Ltd.

¶10

Affidavit of service filed by the petitioner be taken on record.

¶11

The petitioner submits that long-term mining lease was granted in his favour for a period of five years by virtue of registered deed dated 31^st May, 2017 and the term of the lease has expired on 31^st May, 2022. Due to Covid-19 pandemic and lockdown declared by the Government, the petitioner was unable to carry on mining operation for substantial period of time for which he has prayed for extension of the period of lease before the concerned authority.

¶12

Learned counsel draws the attention of the court to Clause 5 of part IX of the deed of lease which states that in the event of delay on the ground of force majeure the period of such delay shall be added to the period of lease. The petitioner submitted a representation before the concerned Authority on 15^th February, 2022 in this

¶13

¶14

regard which is yet to be disposed by the Authority. The petitioner prays for a direction upon the Authority to consider the representation at the earliest.

¶15

It is submitted on behalf of the State respondents that the 3^rd respondent be directed to consider the representation within a stipulated period of time.

¶16

Upon consideration of the submissions made on behalf of the parties and material on record, the writ petition is disposed of directing the 3^rd respondent to consider and dispose of the representation submitted by the petitioner dated 15^th February, 2022 within a period of one month from the date of communication of this order after taking into consideration clause 5 of part IX of the deed of lease and after affording reasonable opportunity of hearing to all the interested parties including the petitioner, in accordance with law.

¶17

With the above directions, W.P.A. 8266 of 2022 is disposed of. However, there shall be no order as to costs.

¶18

Since no affidavit is invited, the allegations contained in the petition are deemed not to be admitted.

¶19

Urgent certified website copy of this order, if applied for, be supplied to the parties upon compliance with all requisite formalities.

¶20

(Suvra Ghosh,J)

Pawan Arora v. State of West Bengal and Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Pawan Arora v. State of West Bengal and Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Chowdhury Abu Nasar and Another Vs State of West Bengal and Ors.

Atiar Rahaman and Anr. Vs State of West Bengal and Ors.

Pintu Bauri Vs State of West Bengal and Ors.

Nitish Ghosh Vs Union of India & Ors.

Abhijit Deogharia and Anr. Vs State of West Bengal and Ors.

Ambey Niwas Pvt. Ltd. and Another Vs State of West Bengal and Ors.