The High Court of Calcutta at Jalpaiguri Bench, upon the submission that the writ petition has become infructuous due to subsequent events, dismissed WPA 636 of 2020 as infructuous and vacated any interim order that may have been passed.
The writ petition WPA 636 of 2020 is dismissed as infructuous. Interim order stands vacated.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
CIRCUIT BENCH OF CALCUTTA HIGH COURT AT JALPAIGURI
10.08.2022 Item No23 Court No. 01 Aloke
WPA 636 of 2020
Goutam Narayan Roy Versus
The State of West Bengal & Ors.
Mr. Deborshi Dhar
… for the petitioner
Mr. Bikramaditya Ghosh, Mr. Momenur Rahman
…for the State
It is submitted on behalf of the petitioner that because of
subsequent events the writ petition has become infructuous.
In view of the aforesaid, the writ petition being WPA 636 of 2020 is dismissed as infructuous.
Interim order, if any, stands vacated.
( Ravi Krishan Kapur, J.)
Goutam Narayan Roy
The State of West Bengal
Ravi Krishan Kapur
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
