Writ Petitions filed by petitioners against the State of West Bengal were dismissed for default as petitioners appeared with no attendance and no accommodation was sought, indicating lack of interest in proceeding.
Petitions dismissed for default; interim orders vacated; no order as to costs.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
December 06, 2022 ARDR (27 to 31)
WPA 4247 of 2008 CAN 1 of 2008 (Old CAN 8863/2008)
Pannalal Mukherjee
Vs.
The State of West Bengal & Ors.
With
WPA 4249 of 2008 CAN 1 of 2008 (Old CAN 8864/2008)
Malay Kumar Ghosh
Vs.
The State of West Bengal & Ors.
With
WPA 4250 of 2008
Pranab Sadhukhan
Vs.
The State of West Bengal & Ors.
With
WPA 4519 of 2008
Shankar Chakraborty
Vs.
The State of West Bengal & Ors.
None appears for the petitioners. No
accommodation is sought.
It appears from the conduct of the petitioners that the petitioners are no longer interested in proceeding with these matters.
In view of the same, WPA 4247 of 2008, WPA 4249 of 2008, WPA 4250 of 2008, WPA 4519 of 2008 and the connected applications are dismissed for default.
2
Interim order, if any, stands vacated.
There shall however, be no order as to costs.
Urgent certified website copy of this order, if applied for, be furnished to the parties upon compliance of necessary formalities.
(Suvra Ghosh, J.)
Pannalal Mukherjee
Malay Kumar Ghosh
Pranab Sadhukhan
Shankar Chakraborty
The State of West Bengal
Suvra Ghosh
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
