The High Court held that the writ petition filed by Sumana Hazra (Kodal) was infructuous because the relief prayed for had already been granted by the respondents, resulting in the dismissal of the petition.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
16.06.2022. Court No.13 Item No. 75 pk
W.P.A. No. 361 of 2022
Sumana Hazra (Kodal) Versus The State of West Bengal & Ors.
Mr. Siddhartha Sankar Mandal, Ms. Tanuja Basak
Dr. Sutanu Kumar Patra, Ms. Supriya Dubey.
…For the petitioner. ..For the WBCSSC.
Mr. Supriya Chattapadhyay, Mrs. Jyotsna Roy
Counsel for the petitioner submits that the writ petition has become infructuous since relief, as prayed for, has already been allowed by the respondents.
Accordingly, the writ petition is dismissed as infructuous.
All parties are directed to act on a server copy of this order duly downloaded from the official website of this Court.
( Rajasekhar Mantha, J. )
Sumana Hazra (Kodal)
The State of West Bengal & Ors.
Rajasekhar Mantha
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
