The High Court at Calcutta dismissed a writ petition (WPA/293/2021) as infructuous on the ground that the matter between the parties was resolved during its pendency, vacating any interim order.
Writ petition dismissed as infructuous; interim order vacated.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT AT CALCUTTA [ CIRCUIT BENCH AT PORT BLAIR ]
…
WPA/293/2021
Nikunja Bihari Mitra … Petitioner
Vs.
The Assistant Engineer … Respondent
Mr. K.Sabir … for the petitioner
Mr. Shatadru Chakraborty Mr. Ramendu Agarwal … for the respondent
June 27, 2022 [SR] Item No.9
It is submitted on behalf of the parties that during pendency of the writ petition, the matter has been resolved.
In view of the aforesaid, the writ petitioner does not
want to proceed with the writ petition.
The respondents are represented.
In view of the submissions made on behalf of the parties, WPA/293/2021 is dismissed as infructuous.
Interim order, if any, stands vacated.
( Ravi Krishan Kapur, J.)
Nikunja Bihari Mitra
The Assistant Engineer
Ravi Krishan Kapur
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
