The High Court dismissed the writ petition for default as neither party appeared, and vacated any interim order.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
17 14.12.2022
sb Ct 550
IN THE HIGH COURT AT CALCUTTA CONSTITUTIONAL WRIT JURISDICTION APPELLATE SIDE
WPA 19348 of 2017
Khaitan Provident Fund Vs.
State Bank of India & Ors.
Ms. Aparna Banerjee
… For the Provident Fund Authorities.
The records would reveal that on 9th November, 2022, when the matter was called on none appeared on behalf of the parties. To provide one more opportunity to the parties to appear the matter was adjourned.
Today, at the time of call, none appears on behalf of the petitioner. No accommodation has been sought for.
In view thereof, let this matter be dismissed for default.
Interim order, if any, stands vacated.
(Raja Basu Chowdhury, J.)
Khaitan Provident Fund
State Bank of India
Raja Basu Chowdhury
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
