The Supreme Court dismissed Writ Petition No. 17254 of 2021 as infructuous, holding that the direction sought had already been complied with. All interim orders connected to the petition were vacated.
The writ petition was dismissed as infructuous. Interim orders, if any, were vacated.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
02.12.2022 Ct. 5 D/L 29 ab
WPA 17254 of 2021
Asish Kumar Mukhopadhyay & Anr. -Vs-
Tata Aia Life Insurance Company Limited & Ors.
Ms. Kakali Samajpaty, Mr. Pramit Chakraborty, ... for the petitioners Mr. Shourjyo Mukherjee, Mr. Vishwarup Acharyya … for the respondent no. 2 Mr. Rajesh Singh … for the respondent no. 3
Learned counsel appearing for the petitioners submits that the writ petition was filed only for a direction on the respondents to consider the representation made on 16th September, 2021.
This has already been done and hence nothing further remains in the writ petition.
WPA 17254 of 2021 is accordingly dismissed as having become infructuous.
Interim orders, if any, shall stand vacated and the connected applications, if any, are disposed of.
( Moushumi Bhattacharya, J.)
Asish Kumar Mukhopadhyay
Tata Aia Life Insurance Company Limited
Moushumi Bhattacharya
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
