Petitioner absent after failing to appear despite adjournment. Court dismissed the writ petition for default noting lack of interest to proceed.
None.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
29th August, 2022 (AK) 13
W.P.A 16744 of 2021
Md. Shadab
Vs. State of West Bengal and another
On August 3, 2022, when the matter was last taken up for hearing, an adjournment was sought on the ground that Mr. Rozario, Advocate did not have instruction to appear on behalf of the petitioner any longer.
When the matter is called on today, none appears to present the petitioner. It appears that the petitioner is no longer interested to proceed with the matter.
Accordingly, WPA 16744 of 2021 is dismissed for default without any order as to costs.
Urgent photostat copies of this order, if applied for, be given to the parties upon compliance of all requisite formalities.
(Sabyasachi Bhattacharyya, J.)
Md. Shadab
State of West Bengal
Sabyasachi Bhattacharyya
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
