Petitioner voluntarily withdrew the writ petition; the High Court dismissed the matter as withdrawn and vacated any interim orders.
Writ petition dismissed as withdrawn; interim order vacated.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1 12.12.2022
sb Ct 550
IN THE HIGH COURT AT CALCUTTA CONSTITUTIONAL WRIT JURISDICTION APPELLATE SIDE
WPA 15872 of 2013
Sushanta Kumar Mishra
Vs.
Union of India & Ors.
Mr. Atindranath Misra, led by Mr. Bharat Bhushan
… For the petitioner.
Mr. Misra, learned advocate representing the petitioner submits that his client does not wish to proceed with the instant writ application. A written instruction to that effect is made over to the Court, which is taken on record.
In view thereof, let this matter be dismissed as withdrawn.
Interim order, if any, stands vacated.
(Raja Basu Chowdhury, J.)
Sushanta Kumar Mishra
Union of India
Raja Basu Chowdhury
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
