Ashton and Ors. vs. The Union of India & Ors. Writ petition was dismissed on the ground of non-prosecution after the petitioner filed a letter not wanting to proceed with the matter. Interim order, if any, stood vacated.
The writ petition is dismissed on the ground of non-prosecution. Interim order, if any, stands vacated.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
02 14.03.2022 rkd Ct.15
W.P.A. 11846 of 2016
Sri Bijoy Kumar Bhattacharjee
-vs-
The Union of India & Ors.
Mr. Subhasis Bandopadhyay
….for the petitioner.
The writ petition has come up in the list under the heading “To Be Mentioned” at the instance of the learned advocate representing the petitioner for non-prosecution.
Mr. Bandopadhyay, learned advocate appears on behalf of the petitioner and submits that petitioner does not want to proceed with the matter and in support of the same he has filed one letter which he has received from his client dated 5th March, 2022 which is taken on record.
Considering the submission made on behalf of the petitioner, the writ petition stands dismissed on the ground of non-prosecution.
Interim order, if any, stands vacated.
Urgent photostat certified copy of the order, if applied for, be given to the parties, upon usual undertakings.
(Saugata Bhattacharyya, J.)
Sri Bijoy Kumar Bhattacharjee
The Union of India & Ors.
Saugata Bhattacharyya
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
