The petitioner submitted that gratuity was paid during the pendency of the petition. The court held no further adjudication was necessary and disposed of the writ petition with no order as to costs.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
July 04, 2022 ARDR (478)
WPA 1152 of 2022
Rampada Bachhar
Vs.
The State of West Bengal & Ors.
Mr. Uddipan Banerjee, Mr. Bipin Ghosh, Mr. Sougata Mitra,
…for the petitioner. …for the respondent no.2. …for the State.
It is submitted on behalf of the petitioner that the entire gratuity has been paid to the petitioner during pendency of the writ petition.
In view of the same, nothing further remains to be adjudicated in the writ petition and as such, the writ petition being WPA 1152 of 2022 is disposed of.
There shall however, be no order as to costs.
Urgent certified website copy of this order, if applied for, be furnished to the parties upon compliance of necessary formalities.
(Suvra Ghosh, J.)
Rampada Bachhar
The State of West Bengal & Ors.
Suvra Ghosh
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
