This order dismisses two contingent applications (CAN 2 of 2022 and CAN 3 of 2022) for default. The court records that the original writ petition was previously dismissed for default on 12 July 2013 and must not be shown as pending.
Applications CAN 2 of 2022 and CAN 3 of 2022 are dismissed for default.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
166 25.11.22
Ct. No. 04
WP.ST. 386 of 2006 CAN 2 of 2022 CAN 3 of 2022
Akd
Kalipada Pramanick Vs.
The State of West Bengal & Ors.
Re: CAN 2 of 2022 Re: CAN 3 of 2022
Mr. Tapan Kumar Mukherjee, Mr. Rajat Dutta.
… for the State.
None appears in support of the instant applications. However, the State is represented.
The applications being CAN 2 of 2022 and CAN 3 of 2022 are dismissed for default.
For the purpose of record it is recorded that the writ petition had already been dismissed for default on 12th July, 2013 and the same should not be shown pending in the docket of the Court.
(Harish Tandon, J.)
(Prasenjit Biswas J.)
2
Kalipada Pramanick
The State of West Bengal & Ors.
Harish Tandon
Prasenjit Biswas
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
