The second appeal dismissed, holding no substantial question of law. The tenancy was validly determined via Section 106 of Transfer of Property Act as West Bengal Premises Tenancy Act did not govern the parties' relationship. No order on costs.
No order as to costs.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
06.05.2022 SL No.3 Court No.8 (gc)
SAT 182 of 2019
Abdul Kader @ Molla Abdul Kader Vs.
Smt. Samita Kar & Ors.
Mr. Animesh Mukherjee, Md. Ali Ahasan, …for the Appellant.
In view of the admitted position that the relationship of the parties is not governed by the provisions of West Bengal Premises Tenancy Act, 1997 and the tenancy has been duly determined by serving a notice under Section 106 of the Transfer of Property Act, we do not find any reason to interfere with the concurrent findings of fact arrived at by both the Courts that the tenancy has been validly determined. However, there is no substantial question of law involved in this matter.
Accordingly, the second appeal being SAT 182 of 2019 stands dismissed.
However, there shall be no order as to costs.
Urgent Photostat certified copy of this order, if applied for, be given to the parties on usual undertaking.
(Sugato Majumdar, J.)
(Soumen Sen, J.)
2 provisions across 2 enactments
Abdul Kader @ Molla
Smt. Samita Kar
Sugato Majumdar
Soumen Sen
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
