The single judge dismissed the second appeal in Santana Ganguly & Ors. vs. Harish Chandra Mondal & Ors. (SA 480 of 1991) for want of prosecution after the appellants submitted a written instruction stating they did not wish to proceed further.
The second appeal and connected applications dismissed for want of prosecution; interim order vacated.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
S/L 4 09.11.2022 Court No.652 SD
SA 480 of 1991
Santana Ganguly & Ors. Vs.
Harish Chandra Mondal & Ors.
Mr. Satyajit Mandal Mr. Suranjan Mandal Mr. Amit Bikram Mahato
… for the Appellants.
Learned counsel for the appellants submit that the appellants do not want to proceed further with the present second appeal and to that extent his clients have sent a written instruction.
Accordingly, the second appeal along with the connected applications, if any, is hereby dismissed for want of prosecution.
Interim order, if any, stands vacated.
Written instruction filed by the appellants be kept with the record.
(Ajoy Kumar Mukherjee, J.)
Santana Ganguly & Ors.
Harish Chandra Mondal & Ors.
Ajoy Kumar Mukherjee
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
