The review petition and connected applications were dismissed as withdrawn with liberty for the petitioner to file afresh.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
29.11.2022 Item No.03 Court No.32 Avijit Mitra
RVW 230 OF 2022 with IA No. CAN 1 of 2022 with IA No. CAN 2 of 2022 in WPA (H) 55 of 2022
Ranajoy Dutta -vs-
Agnidipa Das & ors.
Mr. Pragnadeepta Roy, Ms. Diksha Ghosh, Mr. Sayan Das
…for the applicant/petitioner Mr. Arka Kumar Nag .…for the State Mr. Rajdeep Majumder, Mr. Sourav Chatterjee, Mr. Abhijit Basu, Mr. D. N. Mukherjee, Mr. Mayukh Mukherjee, Mr. Pritam Roy
….for the respondent nos. 1 & 2
On the prayer of the learned advocate-on-record of the applicant, the review petition along with the connected applications are dismissed as ‘withdrawn’ with liberty to file afresh.
(Partha Sarathi Chatterjee,J.) (Tapabrata Chakraborty J.)
Ranajoy Dutta
Agnidipa Das
Partha Sarathi Chatterjee
Tapabrata Chakraborty
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
