High Court at Calcutta dismissed Public Litigation Application PLA 356/2017 for default after the petitioner failed to appear on the fixed hearing date, despite having filed the application in 2017.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
OD –34
PLA 356/2017 IN THE HIGH COURT AT CALCUTTA TESTAMENTARY & INSTATE JURISDICTION ORIGINAL SIDE IN THE GOODS OF: SUBHADRA BHATTACHARYA (DECEASED)
BEFORE:
The Hon'ble JUSTICE KRISHNA RAO Date: 12th December, 2022.
The Court:- The matter was listed on 28th November, 2022 but none appears on behalf of the petitioner and no accommodation was sought for.
For the interest of justice, the case was adjourned till 7th December, 2022 with the rider that if none appears on behalf of the petitioner on the next date fixed, appropriate order may be passed. When the matter is called for, none appears on behalf of the petitioner and no accommodation is sought for. This Court finds from the record that the instant application has been filed from 2017 but subsequently no steps have been taken by the petitioner. This Curt finds that the petitioner is not interested to proceed with the matter and hence this Court has no other alternative but to dismiss PLA No. 356/2017. Accordingly, PLA No. 356/2017 is dismissed for default.
(KRISHNA RAO, J.)
s.chandra/
Subhadra Bhattacharya (deceased)
Krishna Rao
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
