A single-judge bench disposed of MAT 641 of 2021 and IA CAN 1 of 2021, holding that the points urged in the appeal did not survive following a recent judgment in MAT No.44 of 2022.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
19.04.2022 Item No.10 Court No.6.
S. De
M.A.T. 641 of 2021 IA No. CAN/1/2021
Samjad Sekh. Vs
The State of West Bengal & Ors.
Mr. P.P. Roy, Mr. S. Sanyal,
…for the appellant.
Sk. Md. Galib, Ms. Subhra Nag,
…for the State.
Learned advocate for the appellant fairly
submits that in view of the recent judgment of this Court in the case of Panchanan Mahato –Versus- The State of West Bengal & Ors. in MAT No.44 of 2022, the points urged in this appeal do not survive and the appeal may be disposed of.
MAT 641 of 2021 is, accordingly, disposed of along with the connected application being I.A. CAN 1 of 2021.
Urgent certified photostat copy of this order, if applied for, shall be given to the parties as expeditiously as possible on compliance with all the necessary formalities.
(Kausik Chanda, J.) (Arijit Banerjee, J.)
Colour shows how this judgement treated each authority
Panchanan Mahato Versus The State of West Bengal & Ors.Followed¶10
Panchanan Mahato Versus The State of West Bengal & Ors. in MAT No.44 of 2022
Samjad Sekh
The State of West Bengal
Kausik Chanda
Arijit Banerjee
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
