No advocate appeared for the appellant in two calls in this miscellaneous application seeking special leave to appeal. The application and connected case are dismissed for default, and any interim order is vacated.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
08.04.2022 Item No.25. Court No.6. AB
M.A.T. 37 of 2015 With IA CAN 1 of 2015 (Old CAN 377 of 2015)
Bengal Aerotropolis Projects Limited Vs
Jiten Sou & Others
In the first call, nobody appeared for the appellant. In the second call also, nobody appears. No accommodation is sought for.
M.A.T. No.37 of 2015 is dismissed for default along with CAN 377 of 2015.
Interim order, if any, stands vacated.
Urgent Photostat Certified copy of this order, if applied for, be supplied expeditiously after complying with all necessary legal formalities.
(Kausik Chanda, J.) (Arijit Banerjee, J.)
Bengal Aerotropolis Projects Limited
Jiten Sou
Kausik Chanda
Arijit Banerjee
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
