The High Court dismissed the first appeal and connected applications for default due to the non-appearance of the appellant in both calls.
None. Interim orders, if any, are vacated.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
D/L Item No. 25 21.04.2022 KOLE
MAT 351 of 2012 With CAN 1 of 2012 (Old No. 2047 of 2012) With CAN 2 of 2012 (Old No. 2048 of 2012) With CAN 3 of 2012 (Old No. 2049 of 2012)
Partha Pratim Dey -Vs.-
Ramkrishna Das & Ors.
In the first call nobody appeared for the appellant. In
the second call also nobody appears for the appellant.
No accommodation is sought for.
MAT 351 of 2012 and the connected applications are,
accordingly, dismissed for default.
Interim order, if any, stands vacated.
( Kausik Chanda , J .) ( Arijit Banerjee , J .)
Partha Pratim Dey
Ramkrishna Das & Ors.
Kausik Chanda
Arijit Banerjee
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
