Remanded

Union of India and Ors. v. Dr Satyaki Mondal

Calcutta HC14 Dec 2022MAT/1808/2022

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The Single Judge order disposing of a writ petition regarding study leave for a CRPF employee facing departmental proceedings was set aside without merits. The writ petition was remanded for a complete hearing on its merits.

What did the court decide?

The order dated 16th August 2022 setting aside the earlier orders was set aside to the extent it disposed of the writ without adjudicating the study leave issue; warrant remanded.

Union of India and Ors. Vs Dr Satyaki Mondal — Service and Employment | Calcutta HC (2022)

¶1

14.12.22 10 Ct. No.11 Sws.M

¶2

MAT 1808 of 2022 with IA No. CAN 1 of 2022 CAN 2 of 2022

¶3

Union of India & Ors. Vs.

¶4

Dr. Satyaki Mondal

¶5

Mr. Debapriya Gupta

¶6

….for the Appellants

¶7

Mr. S.K. Mukherjee Mr. S.K. Gangopadhyay Mr. A.K. Chakraborty Ms. S. Banerjee

¶8

….for the respondent

¶9

Party/Parties is/are represented in the order of their name/names as printed above in the cause-title.

¶10

Affidavit-of-service filed in Court today be kept with the records.

¶11

The appellant is the Union of India/more precisely the Central Reserve Police Force (for short the CRPF ).

¶12

The respondent No. 1 was the writ petitioner before the Hon’ble Single Bench.

¶13

The respondent No. 1/the writ petitioner arrived before the Hon’ble Single Bench with a writ petition being WPA 11099 of 2022 seeking clearance from his employer/ CRPF for pursuing the Post Graduate ( PG ) Medical Course. Such permission was denied by the employer/ CRPF on the ground that the writ

¶14

¶15

petitioner/respondent No. 1 to this appeal is facing a Departmental Proceeding.

¶16

It is the stand of the appellant/ CRPF before this Court that the appellant must grant vigilance clearance to the respondent No. 1 for pursuing the PG Medical Course.

¶17

By the order dated 11^th July, 2022 in the writ petition, the Hon’ble Single Bench, inter alia, directed the employer/ CRPF to grant study leave as applicable to the writ petitioner/respondent No. 1. It was further directed that the continuance of the PG Course by the writ petitioner as an employee of the CRPF on study leave shall be subject to the result of the writ petition.

¶18

Mr. Gupta, learned Counsel appearing for the appellant/ CRPF, submits that the appellant/ CRPF is aggrieved by the order dated 16^th August, 2022 passed by the Hon’ble Single Bench disposing of the writ petition simply by taking notice of the fact that the writ petitioner has been granted the provisional sponsorship certificate for pursuing the PG Course.

¶19

Mr. Gupta submits and, to the mind of this Court correctly so, that in terms of the order dated 11^th July, 2022( supra ), the grant of a sponsorship certificate does not end the issue raised in the writ petition. It is submitted that the entire process of permitting the writ petitioner to attend the PG Course pursuant to the sponsorship certificate is subject to

¶20

¶21

the result of the writ petition since the writ petitioner is admittedly facing a Departmental Proceeding from his employer. It is, therefore, submitted that the disposal of the writ petition by the order dated 16^th August, 2022 without closure of all issues raised in the writ petition is not justified.

¶22

Mr. Mukherjee, learned Counsel appearing for the writ petitioner/respondent No. 1, submits that there are statutory provisions which permit the writ petitioner to be granted study leave for pursuing his PG Course Administrative instructions of the CRPF cannot take precedence over and above the statutory requirements.

¶23

Having heard the parties and considering the materials placed, this Court is satisfied with the stand taken by Mr. Gupta that the writ petition could not be disposed of by the order dated 16^th August, 2022 without finally adjudicating the issues as noticed in the previous order also of the Hon’ble Single Bench dated 11^th July, 2022.

¶24

Accordingly, the order dated 16^th August, 2022 to the above extent stands set aside.

¶25

The parties shall be entitled to proceed in terms of the Order dated 11^th July, 2022 subject to the result of the writ petition.

¶26

The writ petition be remanded to the Hon’ble Single Bench for a complete hearing on merits.

¶27

¶28

The Hon’ble Single Bench is requested to hear out the writ petition on merits.

¶29

MAT 1808 of 2022 with CAN 1 of 2022 and CAN 2 of 2022 stand accordingly disposed of.

¶30

Since affidavits are not invited, allegations made in the writ petition are deemed not to have been admitted.

¶31

All parties to act on a server copy of this order downloaded from the official website of the Court.

¶32

Urgent photostat certified copies of this order, if applied for, be given to the parties upon compliance of all necessary formalities.

¶33

(Supratim Bhattacharya, J.) (Subrata Talukdar, J)

Union of India and Ors. v. Dr Satyaki Mondal

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Union of India and Ors. v. Dr Satyaki Mondal

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Lilawati Kumar and Ors. Vs State of West Bengal and Ors.

Abhijit Kumar Talapatra Vs State of West Bengal and Anr.

Moutusi Mal Vs State of West Bengal and Ors.

Nilima Das Vs State of West Bengal and Ors.

Sadhana Paul Vs State of West Bengal & Ors.

Dr. Kausik Paul Vs Seacom Skills University and Ors.