The High Court at Calcutta admitted and disposed of the appeal and connected writ applications, directions reserved to consider the appellant's self-same prayer pending below.
Liberty reserved for appellant to make same prayer before court below.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
8 2.12.2022
IN THE HIGH COURT AT CALCUTTA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
F.M.A.T. 695 of 2021 With CAN 1 of 2022
Debu Paick
Vs.
Tata Motors Finance Solutions Ltd.
Mr. Asit Kumar Bhattacharyya … For the Appellant.
Re: CAN 1 of 2022
We admit the appeal.
We think it is premature. The interim application is pending before the learned court below.
This appeal (FMAT 695 of 2021) and the connected application (CAN 1 of 2022) are disposed of with a direction of liberty reserved to the appellant to make the self-same prayer is in the grounds in the memorandum of appeal before the learned court below. The learned court below will consider such prayer in accordance with law.
(I.P. Mukerji, J.)
(Biswaroop Chowdhury, J.)
S.D.
2
Debu Paick
Tata Motors Finance Solutions Ltd.
I.P. Mukerji
Biswaroop Chowdhury
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
