The High Court dismissed FMA 905 of 2022 (docketed here mistakenly as FMA 905 of 2013) for non-prosecution after the parties settled the dispute before the National Lok Adalat.
FMA 905 of 2022 dismissed for non-prosecution.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
21.12.2022
FMA 905 of 2022
LINC Limited Vs.
Court : 04 Item : DL-02 Vs. Matter : FMA Status Transcriber : NANDY: DNP Unomax Pens & Stationary Private Limited & Anr.
Mr. Amitava Mitra, Advocate Mr. Paritosh Sinha, Advocate Mr. Kironjit Majumdar, Advocate Ms. Mobina Ali, Advocate
...…for the Appellants
...…for the Respondents
This matter is mentioned by parties for ‘non prosecution’.
It is submitted that the matter was referred to the Commercial Bench of National Lok Adalat held on November 12, 2022 and the parties have settled the dispute which has been recorded in the said order.
In view of the above, the instant appeal being FMA 905 of 2013 is dismissed for non-prosecution .
Let the order dated 12.11.2022 passed by the National Lok Adalat be kept with the record.
(Harish Tandon, J.)
(Prasenjit Biswas, J.)
2
LINC Limited
Unomax Pens & Stationary Private Limited & Anr.
Harish Tandon
Prasenjit Biswas
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
