Disposed

Kanchan Sardar & Anr. v. State of West Bengal & Ors.

Calcutta HC18 Jan 2022FMA/2363/2014

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The Division Bench held that the Single Judge lacked jurisdiction to entertain a writ petition seeking compassionate appointment for a deceased employee's minor son. The proper forum identified was the State Administrative Tribunal. The appeal against the dismissal order was disposed of.

What did the court decide?

The order under appeal is set aside on lack of jurisdiction; the myth superseding hearing is held to be proper to approach the State Administrative Tribunal.

Kanchan Sardar & Anr. Vs State of West… — Pension and Retirement Benefits | Calcutta HC (2022)

¶1

18-01-2022 debajyoti (Ct. no.06)

¶2

FMA 2363 of 2014 with IA NO:CAN/1/2014 (Old NO:CAN/6220/2014)

¶3

Kanchan Sardar & Anr. Vs. The State of West Bengal & Ors. Mr. Atarup Banerjee, Mr. Kamal Mishra, Mr. Samit Bhanja ... For the Appellants. Mrs. Kakali Samajpaty, Ms. Sudipa Samanta … For the State.

¶4

This appeal is preferred against an order dated April 21, 2014, whereby W.P.9691(W) of 2014 was disposed of. The writ petitioners are the appellants before us.

¶5

The writ petitioners are the wife and son of an erstwhile employee of the Health Department of Government of West Bengal, who died-in-harness. The son of the deceased employee applied for compassionate appointment. He was admittedly a minor at the relevant point of time. The learned Single Judge dismissed the writ petition mainly relying on the Special Bench judgment of this Court in the case of Piali Saha Vs. State of West Bengal, reported in 2013 (1) CHN (CAL) 18. The learned Judge also observed that appointment on compassionate ground is not another source of recruitment, but merely an exception to the general requirement that public appointments should be

¶6

¶7

made strictly on the basis of open invitation of applications and/or merit.

¶8

We are of the view that the writ petition ought not to have been entertained by the learned Judge at all. The proper forum would have been the State Administrative Tribunal, since the son of the deceased employee was seeking appointment in a department of the State Government.

¶9

Only on the basis of lack of jurisdiction of this Court to entertain the writ petition, the order under appeal is set aside. If the writ petitioners are entitled in law to approach the appropriate forum, they may do so.

¶10

With the above observations, the appeal and the connected application are disposed of.

¶11

All parties shall act on the server copies of this order duly downloaded from the official website of this Court.

¶12

Urgent photostat certified copies of this order, if applied for, be supplied to the parties on compliance of necessary formalities.

¶13

(Kausik Chanda, J.) (Arijit Banerjee, J.)

Kanchan Sardar & Anr. v. State of West Bengal & Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Kanchan Sardar & Anr. v. State of West Bengal & Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Cases cited

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

M/S Corona Steel Industry Private Limited Vs State of West Bengal and Ors.

Rajib Daga Vs State of West Bengal and Ors.

Chanchal Kumar Das Vs State of West Bengal and Ors.

D and I Taxcon Services Pvt. Ltd. Vs Kolkata Municipal Corporatin and Ors.

Krishnendu Roy Vs State of West Bengal and Ors.

Barun Barai Vs Tripti Sinha and Ors.