The High Court allowed an appellant's application to withdraw a filed appeal. Based on a settlement executed between the parties, the appeal was dismissed as withdrawn.
The appeal was dismissed as withdrawn by passing orders in terms of prayers 'A' and 'B' of the application.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1 22.11.2022
IN THE HIGH COURT AT CALCUTTA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
F.A. 34 of 2021 With CAN 4 of 2022
Amit Meharia
Vs. Abhilasha Malhotra and Ors.
Mr. Tilak Bose, Sr. Advocate Ms. Urmila Chakraborty Ms. Paramita Banerjee …. For the Appellant. Mr. C.S. Jha Mr. Aditya Kumar … For the Respondents.
Re: CAN 4 of 2022
(Assigned)
The parties executed a memorandum of settlement on 27th August, 2022.
Mr. Tilak Bose, learned senior advocate appearing for the appellant submits that the terms and conditions of the memorandum have been carried out.
In accordance with one of the terms in the said memorandum of settlement this application has been preferred to withdraw the appeal and all connected proceedings in connection therewith.
S.D.
Learned counsel for the respondents has no objection to this application being allowed.
Accordingly, we allow the same by passing
2
orders in terms of prayers ‘A’ and ‘B’ thereof.
Let it be recorded that the appeal be dismissed
as withdrawn in accordance with this order.
(I.P. Mukerji, J.)
(Biswaroop Chowdhury, J.)
3
Amit Meharia
Abhilasha Malhotra
I.P. Mukerji
Biswaroop Chowdhury
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
