Disposed
Shrikanta Mantri v. Hari Prasad Mantri
Calcutta HCEOS/9/1993
Case brief
from the order text
What is this about?
In EOS/9/1993 IN THE HIGH COURT AT CALCUTTA…
What the court decided
AI extract
In EOS/9/1993 IN THE HIGH COURT AT CALCUTTA…
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
OD-22
IA NO. GA/9/2022 In EOS/9/1993 IN THE HIGH COURT AT CALCUTTA EXTRA ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION ORIGINAL SIDE
SHRIKANTA MANTRI Vs
SHREELEKHA MOHTA AND ORS.
BEFORE:
The Hon'ble JUSTICE RAVI KRISHAN KAPUR Date : 18th July, 2022.
Appearance: Mr. Mainak Bose, Adv. Mr. Debmalya Ghosal, Adv. Mr. Niladri Khanra, Adv. …for plaintiff. Mr. R.k. Mitra, Adv. Mr. Sarajit Mitra, Adv. …for defendant no. 1A, 2,3. Mr. Jit Ray, Adv. Mr. Souvik Ghosh, Adv. …for defendant no. 5.
The Court : An affidavit filed on behalf of the parties be kept with the records. It is submitted by the parties that during the pendency of the suit the parties have entered into Terms of Settlement. Let there be a decree in terms of family settlement dated 18 March, 2022. Let there be an order in terms of prayers (a) to (c) of the Notice of Motion.
With the aforesaid direction, GA 9 of 2022 stands disposed of. EOS 9 of 1993 also stands disposed of.
(RAVI KRISHAN KAPUR, J.)
SK.
Shreelekha Mohta
Ravi Krishan Kapur
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court