Disposed

Hindustan Unilever Ltd. v. MD Munna

Calcutta HC17 Jun 2022CS/75/2022

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Upon consent settlement during suit pendency, the Court disposed of the suit and connected applications, directed a decree for the settlement terms, vacated interim orders, discharged the receiver, and ordered destruction of seized goods with remuneration payment to the Special Officer.

What did the court decide?

Suit and connected applications disposed; decree drawn up per settlement; interim orders vacated; receiver discharged; seized goods to be destroyed by Special Officer; Rs.15,000 remuneration to Specia

Hindustan Unilever Ltd. Vs MD Munna — Contract and Commercial Disputes | Calcutta HC (2022)

¶1

CD-6

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT AT CALCUTTA Ordinary Original Civil Jurisdiction ORIGINAL SIDE

¶3

IA NO. GA/1/2022 In CS/75/2022

¶4

HINDUSTAN UNILEVER LTD Vs MD MUNNA

¶5

BEFORE:

¶6

The Hon’ble JUSTICE RAVI KRISHAN KAPUR Date : 17^th June, 2022.

¶7

Appearance:

¶8

Mr. Anjan Dutta, Adv.

¶9

The Court:- It is submitted by the parties that during the pendency of this suit, the parties have settled their disputes in Terms of Settlement duly signed by the parties and their respective Advocates.

¶10

In view of the aforesaid, nothing survives in the suit.

¶11

Let CS/75/2022 alongwith all connected applications stand disposed of in terms of the Terms of Settlement.

¶12

Let a decree be drawn up in terms of the Terms of Settlement expeditiously.

¶13

All interim orders, if any, stand vacated.

¶14

The Receiver stands discharged.

¶15

It is submitted by the parties that pursuant to orders of Court, the Special Officer is seized of certain goods and labels which form the subject matter of the suit.

¶16

¶17

Accordingly, by consent of the parties, the Special Officer is directed to serve a notice on the respective Advocates of both the parties within seven days from date and destroy the seized goods.

¶18

The plaintiff is directed to pay the Special Officer a consolidated remuneration of Rs.15,000/-.

¶19

The Special Officer shall stand discharged after carrying out the aforesaid

¶20

function.

¶21

(RAVI KRISHAN KAPUR, J.)

¶22

D.Ghosh

Hindustan Unilever Ltd. v. MD Munna

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Hindustan Unilever Ltd. v. MD Munna

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Skcl Wealth Management Private Limited Vs Firhad Hakim

Amita Dani and Ors. Vs Sudha Kankaria

Billionsmiles Hospitality Pvt. Ltd. and Ors. Vs Poonawalla Fincorp Limited

Rajendra Kumar Kothari and Anr. Vs Varun Kothari and Anr.

Naushad Ali Vs Dharmender Mohan

Milani Uraon Vs Ramesh Kumar