This is a settlement decree based on terms of settlement filed in an appeal. The court approved the lawful settlement, passed a decree in its terms, and discharged the Receiver automatically upon completion of remaining obligations.
A decree in terms of the Terms of Settlement was ordered.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
CD-2
IN THE HIGH COURT AT CALCUTTA Ordinary Original Civil Jurisdiction ORIGINAL SIDE
IA NO. GA/1/2022 In CS/49/2022 RAJENDRA LIBRARY Vs
SUMANTA BANIK AND ORS
BEFORE:
The Hon'ble JUSTICE RAVI KRISHAN KAPUR Date : 5th July, 2022.
Appearance:
Mr. Rajeev Kumar Jain, Adv. Mr. Abhirup Chakraborty, Adv. Mrs. Laila Khatun, Adv.
Mr. Debdut Mukherjee, Adv.
Mr. S. Bose, Adv.
The Court: The Terms of Settlement filed on behalf of the parties, be kept with the records.
I am satisfied that the Terms are lawful and have been duly signed by the parties as well as their respective Advocates.
In view of the aforesaid, let there be a decree in terms of Terms of Settlement. Insofar as the remaining obligations of the Receiver are concerned, the Receiver is directed to act in terms of the Terms of Settlement and thereafter, shall stand automatically discharged.
In view of the additional work, to be carried out by the Receiver, the Receiver shall be paid a remuneration of 1000 gms by the Advocates on behalf of the plaintiff.
(RAVI KRISHAN KAPUR, J.)
D.Ghosh
RAJENDRA LIBRARY
SUMANTA BANIK AND ORS
RAVI KRISHAN KAPUR
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court