The High Court at Calcutta dismissed the plaintiff's suit as withdrawn following a communication from the plaintiff's counsel requesting dismissal.
Suit dismissed as withdrawn; interim orders vacated.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
OD-1
ORDER SHEET
IN THE HIGH COURT AT CALCUTTA Ordinary Original Civil Jurisdiction ORIGINAL SIDE
CS/34/2015
KAUSHIK NIRMAN (P) LIMITED VS RAMESH M. MEHTA & ORS
BEFORE:
The Hon'ble JUSTICE KRISHNA RAO Date: 21ST DECEMBER, 2022
Appearance: Mr. Ratul Das, Adv. Ms. Dyoti Sen, Adv. ..for the plaintiff
The Court: Counsel for the plaintiff is present.
Counsel for the plaintiff has received the communication dated 19th December, 2022 from one of the Directors of the plaintiff company wherein it is requested to the Counsel for the plaintiff not to proceed with the instant suit any further.
In terms of the communication dated 19th December, 2022 Counsel for the plaintiff prays for dismissal of the suit as withdrawn.
In view of the submission made by the Counsel for the plaintiff and the communication dated 19th December, 2022, CS No. 34 of 2015 is dismissed as withdrawn.
Interim order, if any, stands vacated.
(KRISHNA RAO, J.)
Sbghosh
RAMESH M. MEHTA
KRISHNA RAO
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
