On an application seeking dismissal of a stay application due to settlement and withdrawal of suit, the High Court of Calcutta dismissed the stay application as withdrawn, vacated interim orders, and disposed of the writ petition as infructuous.
CS/183/2012 dismissed as withdrawn, interim orders vacated, GA/5/2022 disposed of.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
OD-19
CS/183/2012 IA NO: GA/1/2012(Old No:GA/1684/2012), GA/5/2022 IN THE HIGH COURT AT CALCUTTA ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION ORIGINAL SIDE
NANDKISHORE PUROHIT VS
UNIQUE ENTERPRENUERS & FINANC LTD.
BEFORE:
The Hon'ble JUSTICE RAVI KRISHAN KAPUR Date : 29th November, 2022.
Appearance: Mr. Rajeev Kumar Jain, Adv. Ms. Laila Khatun, Adv. Mr. Abhirup Chakraborty, Adv. Ms. Sreyashi Chatterjee, Adv. …for petitioner.
Mr. Sagnik Basu, Adv. Ms. Nidhi Bahal, Adv. Mr. Mainak Biswas, Adv. …for defendant.
The Court : GA/5/2022 is an application seeking dismissal of
CS/183/2012 on the ground that the parties have settled the matter and wish to withdraw the suit. The defendant is represented and does not oppose such prayer. In view of the averments made in this application and the submissions made on behalf of the parties, CS/183/2012 stands dismissed as withdrawn.
Interim orders, if any, stand vacated.
With the aforesaid directions, GA/5/2022 stands disposed of. All interlocutory applications stands disposed of as infructuous.
(RAVI KRISHAN KAPUR, J.)
SK.
Nandkishore Purohit
Unique Enterpriseurs & Financ Ltd.
Ravi Krishan Kapur
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
