The revisional application was dismissed as infructuous because the underlying GR case was already disposed of by the trial court acquitting all accused persons, leaving the petitioners uninterested in proceeding.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
6 22.7.2022 sb
CRR 926 of 2018
In the matter of : Smt. Arati Rani Dutta & Ors.
…….Petitioners
Ms. Jharna Biswas Ms. Susmita Biswas Chowdhury …for the petitioners Mr. Anand Kesari Ms. Faria Hossain …for the State
The learned advocate for the petitioners submits that the GR case no. 2207 of 2011 in respect of which the petitioners have prayed for quashing, has already been disposed of by the trial court vide its judgment dated 16th July, 2022. All the accused persons are acquitted by the said judgment.
In view of the above, the petitioners are not interested to proceed with the revisional application.
Let the revisional application being CRR 926 of 2018 is dismissed as infructuous.
A copy of the concerned judgment be kept with the record.
(Ajoy Kumar Mukherjee, J.)
Smt. Arati Rani Dutta
State
Ajoy Kumar Mukherjee
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
