The High Court dismissed the revisional application as withdrawn by the petitioners after an amicable settlement was reached between parties.
Application dismissed as withdrawn; connected applications disposed of; interim order vacated.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. 33 Item 2 Ali 01.07.2022
CRR 860 of 2013
In the matter of:- Shelly Halder & Anr.
……..Petitioners Mr. Dipayan Dan
……for the petitioners.
Mr. Dipayan Dan, learned Advocate appears on behalf of the petitioners and submits that the matter has been amicably settled and as such the petitioner do not intend to proceed with the present application.
In view of above submissions made on behalf of the petitioners, the present revisional application is dismissed as withdrawn.
All connected applications also stand disposed of.
Interim order, if any, stands vacated.
Urgent photostat certified copy of this order, if applied for, be supplied expeditiously after complying with all necessary legal formalities.
(Bivas Pattanayak, J.)
Shelly Halder & Anr.
Bivas Pattanayak
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
