The High Court dismissed a revisional application challenging a charge-sheet because the petitioner instructed counsel not to proceed, and circumstances had changed.
Revisional application dismissed as not pressed; connected applications disposed of; interim order vacated.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
11.03. 2022 item No.64. n.b. ct. no. 34
CRR 797 of 2020
Ajmiri Alam & Anr. Vs.
The State of West Bengal
Mr. Somnath Banerjee Mr. Pronojit Roy
….for the Petitioners
Mr. Anwar Hossain Ms. Debjani Sahu
…..for the State
The revisional application has been preferred challenging the charge-sheet in connection with Suri Police Station Case No.424 of 2016 dated 3.12.2016.
Earlier report was called for. Today Mr. Anwar Hossain, learned advocate appearing for the State submits a report prepared by the Officer-in-Charge, Suri Police Station. Report reflects that next date has been fixed on 07.03.2022 for examination under Section 313 of the Code of Criminal Procedure. There has been change of circumstances since the revisional application was preferred.
Learned advocate appearing for the petitioner submits that he has instructions for not to proceed with the revisional application.
Accordingly, CRR 797 of 2020 is dismissed as not pressed. All pending connected applications, if any, are consequently disposed of.
2
Interim order, if any, is hereby vacated.
All parties shall act on the server copy of this order duly
downloaded from the official website of this Court.
(Tirthankar Ghosh, J.)
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Ajmiri Alam & Anr.
The State of West Bengal
Tirthankar Ghosh
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
