In this criminal revision, the petitioner moved for dismissal on grounds of non-prosecution after filing a written instruction. The single-judge court accepted the submission and disposed of the matter by dismissing the revision accordingly.
The criminal revision petition was dismissed on the ground of non-prosecution.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
04.07.2022 Item No.04. Mithun
Ct.42
CRR 743 of 2022
Dr. Saptarshi Banerjee & Ors
Vs.
Sunipa Ganguly Banerjee.
[
Mr. Prantick Ghosh, Adv.
…for the petitioner.
Mr. Soumya Nag, Adv.
…for O.P.
Ms. Faria Hossain, Adv.
Ms. Mamata Jana, Adv.
…for the State.
Mr. Prantick Ghosh, learned Advocate enters appearance on behalf of the petitioner. The private opposite party is also represented by Mr. Soumya Nag.
It is submitted by the learned Advocate for the petitioners that the petitioners do not want to proceed with the instant criminal revision and the revision may be disposed of on the ground of nonprosecution. The learned Advocate for the petitioners has filed the written instruction made on this behalf. Let the written instruction be kept with the record.
The instant criminal revision is dismissed for non-prosecution.
2
(Bibek Chaudhuri, J.)
3 issues framed by the court
Whether the matter should be disposed of upon the petitioners' representation of non-prosecution.
Whether a criminal revision can be dismissed on the ground of non-prosecution.
What is to be done with the written instruction filed by the petitioners' counsel.
Dr. Saptarshi Banerjee & Ors
Sunipa Ganguly Banerjee
Bibek Chaudhuri
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
