Revisional application to quash proceedings under Section 144(2) CrPC dismissed as infructuous due to expiry of the order under Section 144(4) CrPC and non-appearance of petitioners.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
15.06.2022 S/L No.16 KS
C.R.R. 63 of 2020
Hasem Mallik & Anr. -Vs.The State of West Bengal & Anr.
The matter is listed today under the heading “Contested Application”.
On call none appears for the petitioners as well as for opposite party nos.1 and 2.
Petitioners have prayed for quashing of proceedings in connection with M.P. Case No.1532 of 2019 under Section 144(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure and the order passed therein on 09.12.2019.
In view of the provision of Section 144(4) of the Code of Criminal Procedure the impugned order has no force after expiry of two months.
Under such circumstances, the present revisional application becomes infructuous and the same is dismissed due to non-appearance of the petitioners.
Let a copy of this order be communicated to the Learned Executive Magistrate, Canning for information.
All parties shall act on the server copy of this order downloaded from the official website of this Court.
(Ananda Kumar Mukherjee, J.)
2
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the revisional application for quashing proceedings under Section 144(2) CrPC is maintainable after the expiry of the period specified in Section 144(4) CrPC.
2 provisions across 1 enactments
Hasem Mallik & Anr.
The State of West Bengal & Anr.
Ananda Kumar Mukherjee
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
