Petitioner in a revisional petition (CRR 618 of 2019) withdrew the application, resulting in its dismissal as not pressed and vacancy of any interim order.
Revisional application CRR 618 of 2019 dismissed as not pressed; interim order vacated.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
14.02.2022
Item No.52 Ct.No.34 dc.
IN THE HIGH COURT AT CALCUTTA CRIMINAL REVISIONAL JURISDICTION
C.R.R. 618 of 2019
(Via Video Conference)
Sadananda Mondal
versus
The State of West Bengal
In Re : An Application under Section 401 read with Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 filed in connection with Sessions Case No. 149 of 2018 arising out of Labpur Police Station Case No.70 of 2018 dated 10.06.2018 (G.R. No. 406 of 2018) under Section 302 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860.
Mr. Tanmay Chowdhury … For the Petitioner.
Mr. Tanmay Chowdhury, learned advocate appearing for the petitioner submits on instructions that the petitioner is not inclined to proceed with the instant revisional application. As such, the revisional application being CRR 618 of 2019 is dismissed as not pressed.
Interim order, if any, is hereby vacated.
All pending connected applications, if any, are consequently disposed of.
All parties shall act on the server copy of this order duly downloaded from the official website of this Court.
(Tirthankar Ghosh, J.)
Sadananda Mondal
The State of West Bengal
Tirthankar Ghosh
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
