One-judge order allowing petitioners to agitate revisional points at evidence and final argument stage before disposing of the application. Interim orders vacated.
Leave granted to agitate revisional points at evidence and final argument stages.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
D/L12 14.12.2022 Bpg.
C.R.R.488 of 2021
In Re: An application under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973;
Atanu Pramanik and others Versus The State of West Bengal and another
Mr. Milon Mukherjee, Mr. Rahul Ganguly. …for the petitioners.
Mr. Saryati Datta.
…for the State.
Mr. Milon Mukherjee, learned senior advocate along with Mr. Rahul Ganguly, learned advocate appearing for the petitioners submits that the evidence of the case has already commenced.
Mr. Saryati Datta, learned advocate, appears on behalf of
the State.
In view of the submissions so advanced by the learned advocate appearing for the petitioners, I direct that the petitioners would be at liberty to agitate the points canvassed in the present revisional application at the stage of evidence and also at the stage of the final arguments of the case.
With the aforesaid observations, CRR 488 of 2021 is disposed of.
Pending application, if any, is consequently disposed of. Interim order, if any, is hereby vacated.
All parties shall act on the server copy of this order duly
2
downloaded from the official website of this Court.
Urgent photostat certified copy of this order, if applied for, be supplied to the parties upon compliance of all requisite formalities.
(Tirthankar Ghosh, J.)
Atanu Pramanik
The State of West Bengal
Tirthankar Ghosh
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
