The High Court dismissed a revisional application (CRR 485 of 2014) due to default as the petitioner failed to appear on multiple dates without seeking accommodation.
Revisional application CRR 485 of 2014 dismissed for default; interim order vacated.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
19.12.2022 39 cm
CRR 485 of 2014
Kartick Ghosh Vs.
Debiprosad Chakraborty & Anr.
None appeared for the petitioner and no accommodation was sought, when the matter was called on 14th December, 2022 and 16th December, 2022. Today also when the matter is called, none appeared on behalf of the petitioner. No accommodation is sought.
Accordingly, revisional application being CRR 485 of 2014 is dismissed for default.
Interim order, if any, stands vacated.
Let copy of the order be sent to the trial court for
information and necessary compliance.
Kartick Ghosh
Debiprosad Chakraborty & Anr.
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
