The High Court corrected a typographical error in a previous order, directing that the copy be sent to the Chief Judicial Magistrate, Malda, instead of Alipore, and declared the two orders to be read conjointly.
Correction of the recipient authority in the order dated 27.9.2022 and direction to read the orders conjointly.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
3.11.2022 1 SB Ct. No.236
CRR 4523 of 2008
In the matter of : Monoranjan Saha
Mr. Sujan Chatterjee … for the petitioner
Heard Mr. Chatterjee, learned advocate for the petitioner.
By the order dated 27.9.2022 the proceeding before the learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Malda being G.R. 2411 of 2008 arising out of Kaliachak P.S. Case No. 370 of 2008 dated 20.10.2008 under Section 7(1)(a)(ii) of the Essential Commodities Act was quashed under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure. But inadvertently direction was given to send copy of the order to the learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Alipore, South 24 Parganas for information instead of learned Chief Judicial Magistrate Malda.
The aforesaid typographical mistake be removed.
The server copy may also be corrected accordingly.
The other portions of this order shall remain unchanged.
The inadvertent typographical error is hereby corrected.
The order dated 27.9.2022 shall always be read conjointly
with this order.
(Siddhartha Roy Chowdhury, J.)
1 issue framed by the court
How to correct a typographical error regarding the recipient authority in a prior order quashing proceedings.
3 provisions across 2 enactments
Monoranjan Saha
Siddhartha Roy Chowdhury
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
