This revision petition challenging a maintenance order under Section 125 Cr.P.C. was dismissed as the petitioner's grounds were found insufficient to warrant interference, heard in the absence of parties.
The revision petition was dismissed; interim order vacated; connected application adjudicated with the case.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
20.6.2022 8 AB Ct. No.6
CRR 438 of 2010
In Re : Biswajit Khan
None appears today even on the second call either on behalf of
the petitioner or on behalf of the opposite parties.
Record reveals that previously on 09.6.2022, 10.6.2022 and 16.6.2022 no one appeared in the matter when the matter was called on for hearing. Hence, the case record is taken up for delivering the order in absence of the parties.
In this revision petition the petitioner has challenged the judgment dated 10.5.2006 passed by the learned Additional Sessions Judge, 2nd Fast Track Court, Hooghly in Criminal Motion No. 177 of 2005 affirming the order dated 04.10.2005 passed by the learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Hooghly in M.C. Case No. 203 of 2004 and an order dated 15.1.2010 in M.C. Case No. 261` of 2007 by dint of which a maintenance to the tune of Rs.2000/- per month was allowed under Section 125 of the Cr.P.C. to the opposite party.
On perusal of the grounds stated by the petitioner those are found not to be sufficient and convincing enough to satisfy this Court to interfere into the impugned order passed by the Court below as challenged in this revision petition.
On the finding as above, I am inclined to dismiss the revision case being CRR 438 of 2010. Interim order, if any, stands vacated. Connected application, if any, stands adjudicated with the case.
Urgent photostat certified copy of this order may be supplied to the parties expeditiously, if applied for.
(Rai Chattopadhyay, J.)
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the grounds urged by the petitioner in the revision petition are sufficient to interfere with the order maintaining maintenance under Section 125 Cr.P.C.
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Biswajit Khan
Opposite party
Rai Chattopadhyay
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
