Nasifa Afroze v. Masud Rana Mondal & Anr.
Case brief
What is this about?
In revision application CRR 407 of 2010, the court dismissed the petition for default due to non-appearance of the petitioner in two calls pending final hearing.
In revision application CRR 407 of 2010, the court dismissed the petition for default due to non-appearance of the petitioner in two calls pending final hearing.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
189 28.07.2022 Ct.21 AKG
CRR 407 of 2010
In Re: - An application for revision under Sections 401 and 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973
And
In the matter of: Nasifa Afroze
…. Petitioner
In the first call, no one appeared. In the second call also, none appears.
Accordingly, CRR 407 of 2010 is dismissed for default.
Interim order, if any, stands vacated.
(Kausik Chanda, J.)
Nasifa Afroze
Kausik Chanda
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court