The single judge dismissed Criminal Revisional Application (CRR) 40 of 2021 because the petitioner's counsel submitted that the petitioner died during pendency, leaving the application unpressed.
Revisional application CRR 40 of 2021 dismissed as not pressed; pending applications consequently disposed of.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT AT CALCUTTA 03-11-2022 Criminal Revisional Jurisdiction Subha Item no.28 CRR 40 of 2021 Ct no.34
Goutam Pal.
-versus-
The State of West Bengal & Anr.
Mr. Ankit Agarwala Ms. Alotriya Mukherjee Mr. Robin Basu …for the petitioner. Mr. Madhu Sudan Sur, APP Mr. Dipankar Paramanick
…………for the State.
Mr. Ayan Bhattacharya Mr. Pawan Kumar Gupta Mr. Share qul Haque
…for the opposite party no.2.
Mr. Agarwal, learned advocate appearing for the petitioner submits that he has instructions that the petitioner has passed away during the pendency of the revisional application and as such do not intend to press the present revisional application.
Mr. Bhattacharyya, learned advocate appears on behalf of the private opposite party no.2.
Mr. Sur, learned Additional Public Prosecutor appears on behalf of the State and submits that both the case diaries are available.
In view of the submissions so made, the present revisional application being CRR 40 of 2021 is dismissed as not pressed.
2
Pending applications, if any, are consequently disposed of. All concerned parties are to act in terms of a copy of this order duly downloaded from the official website of this court.
[Tirthankar Ghosh, J]
Goutam Pal
The State of West Bengal
Tirthankar Ghosh
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
