The High Court dismissed a revisional application under CRR 3565 of 2013 for default due to the absence of the petitioner on all call dates.
Revisional application dismissed for default; interim order vacated.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
22.11.2022 40 cm
CRR 3565 of 2013
Puspendu Biswas Vs.
Sucheta Biswas (Nee Mukhopadhyay)
None appeared for the petitioner and no accommodation was sought, when the matter was called on 17th November, 2022, 18th November, 2022 and 21st November, 2022. Today also when the matter is called, none appeared on behalf of the petitioner. No accommodation is sought.
Accordingly, revisional application being CRR 3565 of 2013 is dismissed for default.
Interim order, if any, stands vacated.
(Ananya Bandyopadhyay, J.)
Puspendu Biswas
Sucheta Biswas (Nee Mukhopadhyay)
Ananya Bandyopadhyay
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
