The Court considered an application under Sections 401 and 482 CrPC following a status report showing that the trial concluded with the acquittal of three accused. The Court held the revision infructuous and dismissed it.
Application dismissed and pending connected applications disposed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
D/L4 C.R.R.3401 of 2010 July 27, 2022 In Re: An application under Section 401 read with Section 482 of the Bpg. Code of Criminal Procedure;
Bijoy Thakur Versus
State of West Bengal
Mr. Arijit Ganguly, Mr. Sanjib Kr. Dan. …for the State.
Earlier, there was a direction upon Mr. Arijit Ganguly, learned advocate appearing for the State to submit a status report in respect of Naihati G.R.P.S. Case No.04 of 2008 dated 22.03.2008.
Today, a report has been submitted prepared by the Inspector-in-Charge of Naihati G.R.P.S. which reflects that the trial of the case has been concluded and three of the accused persons have been acquitted from the charges.
It has also been informed that a separate revisional application has been preferred and the records have been transmitted. The said revisional application is in respect of the judgment and order of acquittal passed by the trial court.
Let the report be kept with the record.
Accordingly, CRR 3401 of 2010 has become infructuous and is, therefore, dismissed.
Pending connected applications, if any, are consequently disposed of.
2
All parties shall act on the server copy of this order duly downloaded from the official website of this Court.
(Tirthankar Ghosh, J.)
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the criminal revision is maintainable after the trial court has acquitted three accused persons.
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Bijoy Thakur
State of West Bengal
Tirthankar Ghosh
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
