Bhola Mahato v. Deijen Mahato & Anr.
Case brief
What is this about?
of 2013 With CRAN 2763 of 2013 With CRAN 2…
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
29.02.2024 1 cm
CRR 3176 of 2013 With CRAN 2763 of 2013 With CRAN 2 of 2023
In the matter of : Bhola Mahato.
…. petitioner.
Mr. Arunabha Jana
… for the petitioner
The learned advocate for the petitioner has not filed any application under Section 5 of the Limitation Act for the purpose of adjudicating the application being CRAN 2 of 2023 filed for restoration.
The learned advocate for the petitioner is to take steps to that effect.
Liberty to mention.
(Ananya Bandyopadhyay, J.)
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
Bhola Mahato
Coram
Ananya Bandyopadhyay
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
- Court
- Calcutta HC
- Decided on
- · August
- Registered
- Case no.
- CRR/3176/2013
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court